Tak Khunn Wang vs Mick Lescure Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W L L W W W L
Form
W L W L L L W W L LHead-To-Head: Wang 1 - 0 Lescure
They have played 3 sets in total, with Wang winning 2 and Lescure winning 1. The last match between Wang and Lescure was at the Tunisia F8 (Jerba), 28-02-2018, First, Hard with Tak Khunn Wang getting the victory 6-2 5-7 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tak Khunn Wang | 1 |
| Mick Lescure | 0 |
| Wang | Stats | Lescure |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 265 | Highest Rank | 487 |
| 33 | Age | 31 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 10 | Titles | 4 |
| 58% (337-244) | Career Total W/L | 54% (216-183) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 5-7 6-4 |
Stats 
Tak Khunn Wang
Player
Mick Lescure
59%
(
58 of
99)
1st Serve %
51%
(
47 of
92)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
59%
(
24 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
42 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
96
Total Points Won
95
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 17 | Games Won | 13 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:34:0 | Average Match Time | 2:34:0 |
| 59% (58/99) | 1st Serve % | 51% (47/92) |
| 57% (33/58) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (28/47) |
| 59% (24/41) | 2nd Serve Win % | 56% (25/45) |
| 55% (6/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (4/9) |
| 42% (39/92) | Return Points Win % | 42% (42/99) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tak Khunn Wang vs Mick Lescure Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Wang 1 - 0 Lescure
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wang has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Lescure has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wang, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lescure has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wang has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lescure has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wang has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Lescure winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wang has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 75/ 43), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 47/ 58). Lescure has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 112/ 78), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 59/ 65).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Wang winning 1 times and Lescure being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Wang winning 2 and Lescure winning 1. The last match between Wang and Lescure was at the Tunisia F8 (Jerba), 28-02-2018, First, Hard with Tak Khunn Wang getting the victory 6-2 5-7 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:34:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wang and Lescure have played a deciding set 1 times, with Wang winning 1 times and Lescure 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Wang winning 0, and Lescure 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wang has played against opponents with an average rank of while Lescure has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wang has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lescure has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wang has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lescure has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Tak Khunn Wang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
Player
Tak Khunn Wang
52%
(
45 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
15
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
91
Total Points Won
73
|
6-1 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tak Khunn Wang
Player
Baptiste Crepatte
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tak Khunn Wang
Player
Yannick Mertens
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tak Khunn Wang
Player
Philip Florig
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
1
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-0 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxence Broville
Player
Tak Khunn Wang
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
70%
(
33 of
47)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Louis Wessels
Player
Tak Khunn Wang
70%
(
79 of
113)
1st Serve %
56%
(
64 of
115)
22
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
77%
(
61 of
79)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
46 of
64)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
29%
(
33 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
40 of
115)
120
Total Points Won
108
|
6-7(4) 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tak Khunn Wang
Player
Matt Ponchet
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
50%
(
35 of
70)
2
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
6
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tak Khunn Wang
Player
Leopold Zima
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Bellier
Player
Tak Khunn Wang
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
17
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
35 of
45)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
32%
(
27 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
28 of
78)
86
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mick Veldheer
Player
Tak Khunn Wang
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Mick Lescure Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-6 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Tibo Colson
Player
Mick Lescure
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
23 of
40)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mick Lescure
Player
Julien De Cuyper
49%
(
18 of
37)
1st Serve %
44%
(
17 of
39)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mick Lescure
Player
Loann Massard
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julien Eon
Player
Mick Lescure
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
9
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
5
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 5-7 16-14 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Lopez Montagud
Player
Mick Lescure
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
49%
(
46 of
93)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
9
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
47)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Mick Lescure
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
44%
(
25 of
57)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mick Lescure
Player
Pierre Broquin
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maxence Beauge
Player
Mick Lescure
56%
(
43 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
6
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
8
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mick Lescure
Player
Batiste Klein
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve %
43%
(
19 of
44)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
3 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Wang vs Lescure?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Wang Vs Lescure is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (337/244) | Win/Loss | 54% (216/183) |
| 57% (749/575) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (489/414) |
| 53% (6451/5625) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (4319/3996) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 564 | Aces Total | 893 |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 638 | Total Double Faults | 871 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 603.66 | Average Opponent Rank | 554.4 |
| 59% (10547/17958) | 1st Serve % | 52% (7503/14479) |
| 67% (7077/10547) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (5293/7503) |
| 51% (3759/7411) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3385/6977) |
| 46% (897/1956) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (693/1522) |
| 42% (7535/17985) | Return Points Win % | 41% (5801/14033) |
| 58% (330/571) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (216/397) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (73/139) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 43% (40/92) |
| 52% (85/164) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (51/108) |
| 85% (340/289) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (213/186) |
| 15% (340/51) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (213/27) |
| 20% (241/47) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (185/30) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
